Arizona Immigration Reform Update: Jan Brewer Updates the Law, Will Democrats Retract their Race Baiting and Physical Assault on the Police?

Originally, we posted an article about and containing the Arizona Immigration Bill hated by Obama, Democrats, and violent left-wing protestors like these (yes those are dozens of bottles of fluid being thrown at police and a right-wing counter-protestor).  Kind of feels like punches when it hits you.  Isn’t this what they falsely accuse the tea party of?  But Democrat protestors are excused from monkey-like behavior apparently.  Left-wing media strategy: whitewash –

A very good criticism was filtered up to me by one of the crew.  As you know, we turn off comments here at RAAI to avoid the stupidity on other blogs and YouTube.  Instead, we aggregate criticism from other sources and will feature the best of the best – sometimes just baking the concepts into our writings themselves.  Here, the name is redacted for privacy.  My source tells me that this critique comes from one of the smartest guys he knows:


The rebuttal was also transmitted to me (check your spelling next time A-boy):

I agree with Sowell on this. I didn’t get entirely the same thing as you from it. Let me know what you think about this interpretation. I think it is realism, which admits only a realistic understanding of the world we live in, rather than the world on paper or the world on TV, propaganda, and chit chat. You’re onto that too, which I agree with. I think the disconnect is the presumption of the scale of civil rights infringement.

Every single law is abused. From some of the worst leeches falsifying medicaid hospital reporting to local politbureaus and defrauding the taxpayer, to simple crooks getting housing subsidies from HUD as they hide under-the-table income. Does it mean that I think we should entirely kill medicaid or HUD?


As a black man who despises Democrat-backed Affirmative Action laws, I think Sowell simply acknowledges that there will be cases of discrimination no matter against what race, but that adjudication of the crime belongs in court – not in pre-emptive laws that presume society-wide guilt before proven innocent like Affirmative Action.

This case is the same abstract concept in fact. You identify that great injustice, bankruptcy, murder, defrauding, is occurring, but the Democrat position is to presume society-wide guilt until proven innocent – that the majority of enforcers, even at the threat of law suit, job loss, and social ostracism, will be guilty of racism before proven innocent, and so the Democrats with that ideological subjective faith-system will make the current victims of illegal immigration continue to be victims.

Ideally, Democrats would like to make the case that there is no recourse, as if we are not already hyper-sensitive in the courts to discrimination so much that companies across the USA blow millions in HR policy and severance pay to avoid law suits by minorities and women.

Sowell presents a sarcastic commentary on that misnomer. There is recourse in the rare event that it does occur, just like there has been recourse in other abuses of authority. Are you kidding me? When I finished the LSAT, there were 1M lawyers in America, many of which were chasing something or another to find work. 1 lawyer for every 300 people is way too much, and that’s why they drove wages down to a median of $70k entry level JD.

But the primary objective of Sowell’s piece was to undo the bit of deception going around in Democrat circles now regarding page 1 of the bill – to explain what "lawful contact" really means. What the Democrat commentators are doing now is either willing deception or misinformed deception in saying that it "opens up the ability to stop people for their race". They make this claim by reading an excerpt on page one, and misrepresenting "lawful contact".

I try to avoid this black-and-white line-in-the-sand thing. I think it is a gray and complex issue, and I do believe the scales have tipped towards enforcement because the amount of injustices in the current state of negligence outweigh the handful of true discrimination cases that will arise with more serious measures.

Of course I have personal stake too, being a victim of such negligent Democrat rule of law in a very blue County.  But no justice was done for me. Some people are dead. Some lost children. Every single taxpayer is footing the burden of $70B per year for a classification Sowell calls "parasites". The ruse that getting them on the tax-rolls will help is another Democrat misnomer. The average illegal is not making income that would result in any net income tax revenue for the government, state or local. Rather, it would bleed the taxpaying workers even harder as it opens them up to new entitlements, and ensures victories for the Democrat party for the next 60 years as 12 million new something-for-nothing, entitlement-seeking voters join the polls.

Whether or not new and transparent flat-tax on consumption and abolishment of income tax would ensue? How long would it take to correct the ensuing economic chaos? Not soon enough before we die and enter our old age with no money in medicare or social security.

I like enforcing on all fronts – penalties on employers, border security, deportation in some cases, working visas and a spot at the end of the line for citizenship (13+ years), and this measure to check citizenship with every encounter.

The more multicultural folks among us will note that racism is present in Hispanic populations.  Whites are “gringos” and “yankees”.  Who was it that started attacking cops and the counter protestor?  All the counter-protestor said was “I can go anywhere I want, this is my city too.  Get out of my way Mexicans!”  Confrontational, yes.  But not equivalent to them calling him yankee, and gringo and then violently attacking him and cops.  He didn’t call them beaners.  Looks like we know who the real racists are, yet again – left wingers.

But this bigotry against Americans and whites is rampant even in government.  Take the hypocrite president of Mexico for instance, decrying the Arizona immigration reform at the same time that his policies are draconian against immigrants in comparison: Mexican Hypocrisy Story

Top Democrats, Nancy Pelosi, Obama, Bill Clinton and many more are calling Glenn Beck a traitor and implying that he incites insurrection.  Using the same Obama-logic, we will now demand that Democrats blame Obama for the violence of the Hispanic protestors.  Days prior, Obama gave a speech insinuating that Arizona was “misguided” “abusing their authority” and “against Hispanics and civil rights”.  Of course, you have to translate his silver-tongued lawyer speech to get the real message.  But as we see, the message was heard loud and clear by the emotionally unstable Democrats.

And an update to the law itself, for which I congratulate Jan Brewer.  You heard it first on RAAI – the truth.  We debunked Democrat lies about legal interpretation of the phrase “lawful contact” by authorities.  As you can see, Jan Brewer didn’t waste any time in spending tax money “strengthening” the bill to doubly explain “lawful contact” and double-guard with a provision to link citizenship-check to secondary infractions explicitly:

Read the story

Nothing has changed except pandering to the fallout from deceptive Democrat propaganda.  Any honest lawyer will tell you the bill has the exact same effect with this revision.

Published in: on May 1, 2010 at 2:54 PM  Leave a Comment  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: