Pass Me the Haraam Food, Please!

WARNING ….Please read on!  

clip_image001
Halal – Read the Fine Print

"The other day I wrote about Costco stocking their meat counters with “Halal” meat."
So yesterday I shopped for groceries at my local Walmart. As usual, I bought a bag of frozen chicken breasts, but this time I checked to make sure the meat was not labeled “Halal”.  Here’s why.

Halal is the Islamic term that basically means the meat is lawful to eat for a devout Muslim. What makes it lawful or acceptable is that the meat has been processed in a very specific way.  Unlike kosher food, where the physical processing of the meat is the focus, for Islam it is the spiritual component that makes the meat lawful.
For lawful (halal) meat in Islam, the animal must be killed while the butcher faces Mecca, and either the butcher cries “Allah Akbar” or a tape plays the words over a loud speaker.

Ann Barnhardt,is a cattle commodities broker, has more about “Halal."

NEVER buy meat that is marked as “Halal”.

I am in the cattle business, and believe me when I tell you that Halal kill plants are CONSTANTLY being cited and shut down by the USDA for horrific, infractions. Most of these plants are in Michigan and upstate New York.

One of the things that halal kill plants are notorious for is putting already-dead animals in the human consumption line. They will go pick up a dead cow off of a farm or ranch and instead of putting it in their rendering tank where the resulting “tankage” is worth pennies on the dollar as pet food or industrial products, they will shackle the dead animal on the normal kill line and process it as human food which is the highest-dollar product.

Since Islam teaches dishonesty (taqiyyah) and no regard for one’s non-Islamic neighbor, this kind of sickening behavior is standard.

Halal plants are also notorious for general citations for filth and uncleanliness. I have toured normal cattle slaughter plants, and guys, you could eat off of the floor. Everything is white and men walk around with water hoses and steam guns constantly keeping everything in a state of spotlessness.

Halal plants are filthy. A lot of Halal meat is also labeled as “organic”.

Again, don’t be fooled into thinking that “halal” means “better”. It isn’t. I would never, ever knowingly eat halal meat purely from a food safety perspective.

clip_image002 clip_image003clip_image004
clip_image005

Published in: on October 1, 2011 at 8:15 AM  Leave a Comment  

Rockefeller Lectures YOU on Over-Consumption?

In the first 30 seconds, I said “gee, how soon before Agenda 21 is mentioned?”

Of course, he followed up in the end with Rio and Sustainable Development, not disappointing me.

There is a common thread with these egomaniacal men and women of power – regardless of any claims to the contrary, they do not serve mankind, and they do not serve God, however deluded they may be to feel otherwise.

They fashion themselves as gods, and they believe that a handful of elite persons can possess wisdom that exceeds that of the collective knowledge and wisdom of all humanity, operating in free markets, at a local level, where every individual involved in transactions has a real and personal stake in the outcome. 

So many PhDs and idea-dealers are guilty of the same tragic foolishness.

If the government did not shuttle around money and redistribute tax burdens and provision welfare – that is – if more than 50% of the population was actually paying taxes, there would not be overconsumption. 

If everyone was living within their means and not on credit, if everyone was not living on redistribution from their neighbors’ tax seizures, and if everyone was not living on Communist slave labor, then citizens would not be over-consuming, because the West would still have manufacturing and we would be making our own things, and we would have more blue collar jobs. 

There would be less people working part-time for life.  There would be less people on welfare, because they would have to work for a living.  And busy hands are not consuming hands, they are producing hands. 

The ungodly compression of the middle class has created a maximum of consumption, and it is entirely the fault of liberal elites who have sought this panacea of redistribution and progressive taxation (amongst other political tricks) for ideological purposes.

Just as the blundering “brilliant” PhDs did not anticipate these side effects of their socialism, so Rockefeller, Soros, Obama, Sunstein, Holdren, Clinton, Strong, and the rest do not comprehend the side effects of the experimentation they now have underway.

But the sweetest irony is not the fact that they never learn from their mistakes, let alone admit to culpability in the slightest – it is that a Rockefeller, a Bill Gates, a George Soros, an Al Gore, an Obama, a Nancy Pelosi, a Maurice Strong, have the nerve to tell anyone else about “over-consumption”.  I’m pretty sure that a small country could survive on what David Rockefeller consumes in one month.

Do these liberal socialist elites not possess mirrors?  Or are they truly that delusional?  In my 63 years, I haven’t seen such hypocrisy.

I imagine the feelings evoked are similar to what feudal peasants must have felt when a government-controlled high priest lectured them about humility and poverty during the middle ages.

Rockefeller tells you about how tragic it is that you’re living longer and that more people are surviving infant mortality

Message to the socialist New World Order psychopaths: if the natural world has constraints that we are headed towards, it will take care of itself, and people will adapt to their changing environment, however culled by nature.  We do not need you to make our lives miserable and create a string of new foolish unintended consequences in the process. 

Now if you would like to help every person live within their means and undo the redistribution that has contributed to overconsumption, let’s talk about it.

Published in: on November 4, 2010 at 12:31 AM  Leave a Comment  

Alcohol Worse than Hard Drugs? WHO Strikes Again, as the Amsterdam Experiment is Swept Under the Rug.

Oh, how many fraudulent studies do we have to expose in connection to the UN’s WHO? 

First, it was their propaganda for socialist medical systems, which, based on differences in collection of mortality data and a fundamental flaw in inferences drawn from mortality tables, incontrovertibly created widespread ignorance amongst the pseudo-intellectuals regarding “how good” European socialist healthcare is.

Now, in the progressive quest to create their army of easily manipulated, disengaged, distracted, drug-addicted drone-citizens – the same WHO players and front organizations produce a study to “prove” that alcohol and tobacco are worse than smoking pot and doing hard drugs.

Unbelievable.

To you, our WHO detractors, are you ready for a wallop?

Your study is flawed fundamentally and thusly:

Using your statistics for death by alcohol-related car accidents, heart, mental health, and cancer complications in contrast to that of hard drugs presumes that both alcohol and hard drugs enjoy the exact same persistence in society.  It also presumes that data collection for black market health impacts (drugs) is even nearly as accurate as data collection for legal instances of gluttonous impact (alcohol).

Statistically?  Your inputs are double-invalidated.

The success of the war on drugs has been exactly to create that disparity of prevalence, geniuses.  If heroin was as common as beer, you would see the statistics you used for alcohol-related health issues skyrocket.

What kind of a wishful-thinking drone would even get a notion that there is an ounce of merit in your claim?  You just have to walk into a rehab center to see the mental health impacts of hard drugs, and the other health impacts.  Here is what you need to do to correct your study and measurements:

Make your model assume that smoking crack and pot becomes as frequent and common as smoking a cigarette and drinking a beer.  Multiply the hard-drug related deaths, suicides, crime, health issues, heart issues, and the rest by the same factor.

Now your entire model implodes on itself.  But this much was already obvious amongst objective people with common sense. 

The hard drug substances themselves are much more potent, and the physiological response and health impact is much more acute for pot vs. tobacco, and crack vs. alcohol.  If we legalize, and normalize the consumption of hard drugs, and when it becomes as commonplace as cigarettes and beer, the social and economic impact will be one of the darkest chapters of human history.

When ideology trumps objectivity, ignorance covers common sense.  As the Mayor and police of Amsterdam claim “we are in the midst of modern slavery” in regards to unabated legalization of prostitution and drugs, progressives are desperately trying to get the poisonous legalization policies of Amsterdam spread, and populations hooked, before analysis of the failures of Amsterdam take root.

It baffles my mind how dedicated the progressive evolutionary socialists are to collapsing the systems and freedom in the West.  They would ruin millions of lives, and bankrupt our healthcare system with drug treatment and catastrophically expensive end-of-life care, and shortened productive lives, just to move the world towards their ideal vision.

Meanwhile, the progressives’ favored “State Capitalists” (communists) in China and Russia continue to grow their economic output to equalize the West, as they send their own drug users to slave prison camps for 7 years, and execute their drug dealers by firing squad.

The timing of George Soros’ scheme and California ballot measure?  Not a coincidence, as we posited in this article:

Most Conservatives Don’t Have a Clue about Fabian Socialism–Pot Legalization is a Dependent-Creation Scheme

As for the latest volley: Read the story

Published in: on November 2, 2010 at 2:43 AM  Leave a Comment  

Tell Your Lady–Green Tea doesn’t Protect the Ta-tas

Sadly, yet another series of case studies on green tea, wasting hordes of money, giving people false science to believe in, false hopes, and false consumption influence for years.

Read the story

Published in: on November 2, 2010 at 1:51 AM  Leave a Comment