US Currency, Inflation, Stealth Tax & China’s Warning to Obama–The Econ War Escalates

The Democrats have released their attack hound for the next round of brainwashing.  In a recent Wall St. Journal article, Bloomberg sets up Republicans to take the blame and fall for the destruction that Obama’s Keynesian economic policy has created.

Does this remind anyone of the trajectory of the “affordable housing” crisis that began this whole mess?

Bloomberg even says that the newly elected Republicans can’t even read (he’s a good propagandist, but not a master):

Bloomberg predicts Chinese Trade War

But those who actually follow the facts, will spot this reprehensible deception and despicable attempt at brainwashing a mile away.  Lest we recall, China, in 2009, warning Obama not to dishonor their investments.  A little cultural background: talking about honor is a very serious warning.

China Admonishes Obama to Forbid Quantitative Easing (Fed-created inflation)

Then there is George Soros, bankrolling Obama and the DNC and their tributaries.  Soros wants the US dollar to have a “managed decline”.  He has said it in plain language with his own mouth.  This does not benefit Americans.  It benefits worldwide wealth redistribution, as is the goal of Fabian socialists like Soros. 

Well, with Obama going along with QE2, and the $600B money printing last week, it would appear that Obama is doing George Soros’ bidding, and further “dishonoring” China’s investments against their direct admonitions.

Is it any wonder that Obama agreed to this trip during this timeframe?  November elections, he knew he would get nailed.  Then, execute QE2 by the Fed the very next day while all the election hoopla is taking up the media cycles.  Then execute trip to India and China to try and smooth over the fallout from the destruction-of-standing-wealth thievery.

In short, when China responds to this economic warfare in kind, with a “trade war”, Bloomberg & Democrats are already setting up and will blame the newly elected Republicans who had nothing to do with the instigating Keynesian policies.

This, to cover up the real source of the coming US-China economic turmoil: Obama’s Fed doing exactly what China told them not to do.

Obama’s Fed – The Results of QE2 – Inflation – Gold & Oil Prices Soar

Published in: on November 8, 2010 at 11:42 PM  Leave a Comment  

Rockefeller Lectures YOU on Over-Consumption?

In the first 30 seconds, I said “gee, how soon before Agenda 21 is mentioned?”

Of course, he followed up in the end with Rio and Sustainable Development, not disappointing me.

There is a common thread with these egomaniacal men and women of power – regardless of any claims to the contrary, they do not serve mankind, and they do not serve God, however deluded they may be to feel otherwise.

They fashion themselves as gods, and they believe that a handful of elite persons can possess wisdom that exceeds that of the collective knowledge and wisdom of all humanity, operating in free markets, at a local level, where every individual involved in transactions has a real and personal stake in the outcome. 

So many PhDs and idea-dealers are guilty of the same tragic foolishness.

If the government did not shuttle around money and redistribute tax burdens and provision welfare – that is – if more than 50% of the population was actually paying taxes, there would not be overconsumption. 

If everyone was living within their means and not on credit, if everyone was not living on redistribution from their neighbors’ tax seizures, and if everyone was not living on Communist slave labor, then citizens would not be over-consuming, because the West would still have manufacturing and we would be making our own things, and we would have more blue collar jobs. 

There would be less people working part-time for life.  There would be less people on welfare, because they would have to work for a living.  And busy hands are not consuming hands, they are producing hands. 

The ungodly compression of the middle class has created a maximum of consumption, and it is entirely the fault of liberal elites who have sought this panacea of redistribution and progressive taxation (amongst other political tricks) for ideological purposes.

Just as the blundering “brilliant” PhDs did not anticipate these side effects of their socialism, so Rockefeller, Soros, Obama, Sunstein, Holdren, Clinton, Strong, and the rest do not comprehend the side effects of the experimentation they now have underway.

But the sweetest irony is not the fact that they never learn from their mistakes, let alone admit to culpability in the slightest – it is that a Rockefeller, a Bill Gates, a George Soros, an Al Gore, an Obama, a Nancy Pelosi, a Maurice Strong, have the nerve to tell anyone else about “over-consumption”.  I’m pretty sure that a small country could survive on what David Rockefeller consumes in one month.

Do these liberal socialist elites not possess mirrors?  Or are they truly that delusional?  In my 63 years, I haven’t seen such hypocrisy.

I imagine the feelings evoked are similar to what feudal peasants must have felt when a government-controlled high priest lectured them about humility and poverty during the middle ages.

Rockefeller tells you about how tragic it is that you’re living longer and that more people are surviving infant mortality

Message to the socialist New World Order psychopaths: if the natural world has constraints that we are headed towards, it will take care of itself, and people will adapt to their changing environment, however culled by nature.  We do not need you to make our lives miserable and create a string of new foolish unintended consequences in the process. 

Now if you would like to help every person live within their means and undo the redistribution that has contributed to overconsumption, let’s talk about it.

Published in: on November 4, 2010 at 12:31 AM  Leave a Comment  

Alcohol Worse than Hard Drugs? WHO Strikes Again, as the Amsterdam Experiment is Swept Under the Rug.

Oh, how many fraudulent studies do we have to expose in connection to the UN’s WHO? 

First, it was their propaganda for socialist medical systems, which, based on differences in collection of mortality data and a fundamental flaw in inferences drawn from mortality tables, incontrovertibly created widespread ignorance amongst the pseudo-intellectuals regarding “how good” European socialist healthcare is.

Now, in the progressive quest to create their army of easily manipulated, disengaged, distracted, drug-addicted drone-citizens – the same WHO players and front organizations produce a study to “prove” that alcohol and tobacco are worse than smoking pot and doing hard drugs.


To you, our WHO detractors, are you ready for a wallop?

Your study is flawed fundamentally and thusly:

Using your statistics for death by alcohol-related car accidents, heart, mental health, and cancer complications in contrast to that of hard drugs presumes that both alcohol and hard drugs enjoy the exact same persistence in society.  It also presumes that data collection for black market health impacts (drugs) is even nearly as accurate as data collection for legal instances of gluttonous impact (alcohol).

Statistically?  Your inputs are double-invalidated.

The success of the war on drugs has been exactly to create that disparity of prevalence, geniuses.  If heroin was as common as beer, you would see the statistics you used for alcohol-related health issues skyrocket.

What kind of a wishful-thinking drone would even get a notion that there is an ounce of merit in your claim?  You just have to walk into a rehab center to see the mental health impacts of hard drugs, and the other health impacts.  Here is what you need to do to correct your study and measurements:

Make your model assume that smoking crack and pot becomes as frequent and common as smoking a cigarette and drinking a beer.  Multiply the hard-drug related deaths, suicides, crime, health issues, heart issues, and the rest by the same factor.

Now your entire model implodes on itself.  But this much was already obvious amongst objective people with common sense. 

The hard drug substances themselves are much more potent, and the physiological response and health impact is much more acute for pot vs. tobacco, and crack vs. alcohol.  If we legalize, and normalize the consumption of hard drugs, and when it becomes as commonplace as cigarettes and beer, the social and economic impact will be one of the darkest chapters of human history.

When ideology trumps objectivity, ignorance covers common sense.  As the Mayor and police of Amsterdam claim “we are in the midst of modern slavery” in regards to unabated legalization of prostitution and drugs, progressives are desperately trying to get the poisonous legalization policies of Amsterdam spread, and populations hooked, before analysis of the failures of Amsterdam take root.

It baffles my mind how dedicated the progressive evolutionary socialists are to collapsing the systems and freedom in the West.  They would ruin millions of lives, and bankrupt our healthcare system with drug treatment and catastrophically expensive end-of-life care, and shortened productive lives, just to move the world towards their ideal vision.

Meanwhile, the progressives’ favored “State Capitalists” (communists) in China and Russia continue to grow their economic output to equalize the West, as they send their own drug users to slave prison camps for 7 years, and execute their drug dealers by firing squad.

The timing of George Soros’ scheme and California ballot measure?  Not a coincidence, as we posited in this article:

Most Conservatives Don’t Have a Clue about Fabian Socialism–Pot Legalization is a Dependent-Creation Scheme

As for the latest volley: Read the story

Published in: on November 2, 2010 at 2:43 AM  Leave a Comment  

Internal Dissent Amongst Progressives–Engineers meet the Intelligentsia

It’s no secret that a majority of software, computer, and high technology engineers are liberal, in stark contrast to all other high technology pursuits with the exception of Environmental Engineering.

That is why the scuffle between Comedy Central and Fark/Reddit is so amusing:

Read the story

The engineers at Fark/Reddit are dumbfounded by Stewart’s ignorance of social networking and high-tech marketing.  Simultaneously, Stewart is dumbfounded by Fark/Reddit’s claims to real contribution.

Both contestants are missing opposite pieces of knowledge.  The liberal believers at Fark/Reddit are ignorant of intellectual operations and politics.  Stewart, as a pseudo-intellectual member of the idea-only, pontificating intelligentsia, is ignorant of productive endeavors which actually achieve real units of work for human beings – the things that occur outside of words and ideas.

Why did Fark/Reddit expect that Stewart and Colbert should understand business and technology?  The clowns comedians are just talkers backed up by dozens of writers.  Their only talent is to read a script and perform it in a funny way, and react in interviews in funny and witty ways.  Their only mental contribution is approving or denying what their writers shove in their face.

By contrast, what did Stewart expect of Fark/Reddit?  The software wizards work hard for those services and products.  They expect the credit that they deserve for maximizing the impact of liberal propaganda.

For those interested in exploiting this division amongst the progressives, the fissure is certainly there – a classic battle between the intelligentsia and the workers/engineers/doctors/practitioners.

Published in: on November 2, 2010 at 1:44 AM  Leave a Comment  

Most Conservatives Don’t Have a Clue about Fabian Socialism–Pot Legalization is a Dependent-Creation Scheme

Read this well-intended, but incorrect article about ideas on why George Soros (one of the richest men in the world, Democrat funder, billionaire, socialist, New World Order supporter), is funding initiatives to legalize pot.

Read the story

None of these explanations have hit the heart of the reason.  They represent superficial thinking.

In order to gain understanding of this strategy – as just another tactic in the Fabian (evolutionary) socialist playbook – you must do a few things.

First, read “Rules for Radicals” by Saul Alinsky.  Then read “Mobilizing the Poor: How it Could be Done” and “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty” by Cloward and Piven.  Then read “The Coming Insurrection” by The Tarnac 9.

Essentially, the idea is to collapse the systems of governance, business, technology, finance, defense, and stability, so that socialist tyrants can come in with an authoritarian government and provide all of the Marxist, communist-inspired “solutions”.  It is not conspiracy theory.  It is out in the open in black and white text.  All you have to do is unplug the bananas from your ears, and take the leftists at their clear word. 

In collapsing the system, they redistribute power and wealth, and they remold society to their liking, with your complicity, so long as they bring order in a violent, chaotic, and unpredictable transitional period.

So where does drug legalization fit in this picture? 

Reflect upon the people in your life who are addicted to alcohol, sex, or gambling.

I’m not just talking about alcoholics or people under water from gambling debt.

I’m talking about people whose lives are consumed by hours-per-week on bars.  I’m talking about people whose lives are consumed by hours-per-week on pornography or casual dating.  I’m talking about people whose lives are consumed by hours-per-week on casinos and gaming.

If people are mostly preoccupied with such vices, this does numerous things to lead us into collapse and a socialist “New World Order” as George Soros, Media Matters, Huffington Post, and the rest speak of.

Keep this one concept in your mind throughout each point.  A philosophical, the strategy is always to reduce the potential and the power of the individual, while simultaneously increasing the power and potential of the collective.

1. Fundamental Unit of Society Destruction

Most importantly, drugs destroy families.  Human beings that are obsessed with their own entertainment and “tune-out” activities are of no service to others.  If parents have to work for a living, and spend an additional 20 hours per week on some vice like alcohol, sex, pot, or gambling, in addition to all the other entertainment activities – shopping, socializing, TV, games, movies, travel, etc., how exactly are they raising children at the same time? 

Ostensibly, you could include children on the other activities of self-servitude and entertainment, so at least you are together, but during the activities of vice – alcohol, gambling, sex, drugs – your family is left out cold.

Destroying the family reduces the power of individuals, because children are not raised by their own culture, and their own parents.  They are raised by media, television, state employees (teachers).  This increases the power of the collective.

Increased divorce and division increases the power of the collective because lawyers receive a huge redistribution of wealth, government services are engaged more often than with stable and independent families, and once again, the power of the individual is reduced.

2. Economic Bleeding

Aside from destroying families, it also removes human beings from productive efforts.  Clothing, energy, fine arts, sports, construction, engineering, all of these industries and products help human kind.  They give humans inspiration, they take care of their basic needs, they solve problems of nature, they elevate humans to higher states of existence. 

When billions of dollars per year are locked up in addictive pursuits, the gentler and sheltering industries suffer.  Simple economics.  The money and power is locked up in activities which debase our nature, remove our potential, distract us from progress, and make us dependent on the people who can give us access to the vice. 

The vice becomes a primary expense, that is no longer discretionary, and will cut into other spending on a widespread basis – college funds, healthcare, better homes, better communities, better family adventures. 

The vice removes addicted consumers from money pools that are used to elevate humans and progress our species.

This economic bleeding aids in societal collapse – because challenges of science and nature continue to arise, and significant money and power is locked up in labor and production that does nothing to cover our basic needs, nor elevate us, nor tackle the ongoing problems.

The power of the collective is increased by creating fewer small businesses and independent entrepreneurs who wield money and power.  Wealth is tied up in highly regulated, large vice industries which are largely unstable and un-survivable through generations. 

3. Creating Dependency

The ultimate desire of the socialist elites is to have an inept populace, incapable of great things, but only capable enough to be actors in the hierarchical oligarchy – to fulfill the minor roles of mediocrity that are provided in a mostly equal-outcome based socialist order.

Drugs, including pot, along with other vices of sex, alcohol, and gambling are the single best way to control people.  We have decades of experience in inner cities to prove this beyond any reasonable doubt.  If you’re really good, you can hook elites on this too, as in the inner city, even wealthy people get caught up in the dependency systems and live their lives to serve themselves, blowing all of their money on vice and self-servitude.

When human beings have no standing legacy, no standing wealth, and are living like sewer rats, just waiting moment-to-moment for their next vice-fix, then they are very easy to manipulate and control.  They are children.  They are dependents.  Once they are hooked, breaking out is difficult, and their psychologies are nearly irreparable.

Being that the government regulates sex, gambling, alcohol, and drugs (if Soros has his way with us), they then control the human beings.  They control how the business looks, what things cost, how it is taxed, where distribution can occur, how distribution occurs, who is subsidized, what big-government contingencies will be forced upon non-culpable taxpayer to deal with side-effects for citizens choosing the lifestyles (such as increasing police expenditures near casinos, healthcare facilities for substance abuse, etc.)

When human beings are less capable of standing on their own, and need access to exponentially higher security (police), and healthcare, they are dependents, whose wealth will be transferred to the lords of the vice manufacturing, in addition to secondary recipients like doctors, rehab teachers, and police officers, whose additional labor is required because of their activities.

In this way, creating dependent human beings, addicted to vice, the power of the individual is decreased and the power of the collective is increased.

4. Healthcare Burden

Basic fact – we are spending billions per year treating acute and long-term side effects of vice (for sexually transmitted diseases, psychological “issues” and “imbalances”, pharmaceuticals, doctors, cancers, security and police, rehab, lung disease, credit problems, bankruptcy, etc.)

If your insurance company pays for treating these side effects, then you are being forced to pay increased healthcare costs in everything you need for the vice-entertainment activities of your neighbors.  Your vice-addicted neighbors do not have natural problems created by nature, or genetic disease.  They have expensive health problems that they have brought upon themselves with their own gluttonous choices in using drugs, alcohol, gambling, and loose sex.

Because of this, legalizing yet another huge vice is a great way to even harm consumers who have nothing to do with the activities.  They will suck the money out of their taxes, their homeowners insurance pools, and out of their health insurance pools.

This huge transfer of wealth from meritorious citizens to blunt the consequence of their neighbors’ self-afflictions decreases the power of the individual and increases the power of the collective.


It is not news that socialists would like to help the West collapse with the drug industry.  Communist intelligence black ops have maintained relationships with drug cartels for decades.  At the same time, communists execute drug dealers, and imprison users for over 7 years.  Take China in recent years:

“The [Chinese] government’s official response to drug use is zero tolerance and in the year 2002 over 60 people were executed for drug crimes. Possession cases receive no less than 7 years imprisonment. As the seriousness of China’s drug problems continues to grow the government has come to accept certain harm reducing policies. Illicit drug users are now referred to as ‘illegal patients’ rather than ‘illegal persons’ and according to Chinese law drug users must be rehabilitated. Most recently, China has established a methadone program for heroin users in an attempt to reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS and hepatitis through injection drug use.”

Why people can’t see the big picture is just a testament to how much information is required to understand it.  There is no conspiracy theory.  This information is all in black and white, quoted by Obama, quoted by the Clintons, quoted by George Soros, quoted by Maurice Strong.

If you look at every policy, you can see the redistributionist goals, which intend on crushing the potential and power of the individual, while elevating the power and control of the collective.  Cap-and-trade (country-to-country wealth redistributionist theft), socialized healthcare, government-financial market bailouts, and for you conservatives out there – even war. 

Tell me, what do you think the “New World Order” of Iraq and Afghanistan will look like after the USA rebuilds the new nations into their liking?  How much money do you think that will have cost US Citizens?

Progressive leftists yearn for legalization of drugs for all these reasons.  All of the surface-thinkers will make specious appeals to “harmless” activities, “freedoms”, “rights”, “prison impact”, and other propaganda.

We think differently, those who are engaged in the fight for true freedom; the freedom of the individual, the ideal of merit, and the right to not be forced to bear the consequences of the harmful choices of other citizens.

There is a reason why drugs belong in the shadows.  While progressives would like to pile-on the already rampant vices of sex, alcohol, and gambling to further their goals of collapse and reorder, intellectuals disagree.  Intellectuals would like for the worst of the vices, and the most addictive – drugs, including pot, to remain where it should remain – as a dirty word, in the shadows.

While communists continue to aid and abet drug cartels, some would say that we should just let them in our front door and try to co-opt them and regulate them.  This scheme does not work in warfare.  Look at what Mutually Assured Economic Destruction has done to our economy, in shipping all manufacturing overseas.  Letting them in the front door does not work. 

The unintended side effect is then allowing foreign interests yet another avenue to streamline their bankrupting of our country.  At least while drugs are illegal, the DEA can seize the money and suck it all back up into the American economy.  When drugs are legal, that will not happen.

In ideological legalization circles, there is so much talk about the cost of law enforcement, but little talk about the recapture of the money from interdiction efforts.

RAAI believes that drugs should remain illegal, and that possession of pot should not carry any jail time (which it already rarely does, contrary to fear-mongers on the left who lie about the prevalence of jail time for pot). 

RAAI further, unanimously agrees that the DEA and drug interdiction efforts should operate as a war machine, and that they should more actively expose the NGO and foreign government collusion with the drug cartels. 

Certainly, the drug cartels are operating as a war machine with tactics of terrorism that date back to Islamic incursions upon Eastern Europe in the 16th century and Romanian defensive tactics of brutality.

While leftists demand a pseudo-police operation to handle what is actually a warring enemy, on the basis of civility and low-profile defense, RAAI feels that this naivety is one of the greatest insults to anyone who has ever been negatively impacted by narcotics.

When the enemy creates war, you must war back in kind, to adequately defend.  Any weaker response not only fails to defend, but it also sends the enemy a message that you are not as serious about the game as they are.  This morale-booster inspires further hostilities and aggression from the enemy.

For the socialist, New World Order folks, it really is not such a mystery as to why their puppeteer, George Soros, wants to legalize drugs.  This ploy is just one of many tactics to stifle the power, prosperity, freedom, and independence of the individual, whilst increasing the power of the collective and the dependencies of the individual upon the collective.

Communist funding of “free” pornographic websites in the West since the mid 1990s is another tactics of the same color.  Just like China aids the drug cartels at the same time it executes drug dealers in its own Country, so too, do they promote these vices in the West to weaken us, at the same time that they ban pornography in their own countries.

Now the question remains – who is wise and dedicated enough to synthesize all of this information and proudly proclaim to their friends and family that they understand how large powers attempt to control and manipulate them?  Do you now feel empowered?  Do not despair.  Your ignorance and surface-thinking and disengagement and impatience is the only thing that can allow them to win.  Tell your neighbors today to engage.  Tune in to Glenn Beck and keep your eye on RAAI.

Published in: on October 28, 2010 at 7:48 PM  Comments (1)  

Waterboarding? How About a Kangaroo Court Murdering Teenage Girls.

We got one for the leftists who exerted the full force of their (pseudo)intellect on the outrageous USA waterboarding of 3 mass-murdering masterminds to save millions of lives.

Warning, after reading this, you’ll want to make it national news, and dedicate your lives in the name of the murdered young girls, just like you did on behalf of the mass-murdering terrorists.

Read the story

Published in: on October 28, 2010 at 4:39 PM  Leave a Comment  

Bush’s Wars, Obamacare, Hilarycare – What’s in a Name Brand Anyway?

You might get giggles, frowns, smiles, or even praise for associating massive plans and movements with the political perpetrator of the movement.  On numerous occasions I have observed this response.

What’s in a name brand anyway?

There are really three main reasons why we label movements after the perpetrator:

  1. An opponent of the movement uses the label to remind detractors of the person responsible for the movement they hate
  2. A proponent of the movement uses it to proudly take credit for the movement they love
  3. Objective and analytical people use it to correctly associate and evaluate the merits of the supporters and detractors, while accurately associating organizational divisions to the policy at hand

At RAAI, we’re not much for the first or second motivation.  Most of us are independents – not registered with any party, and not actively supporting or donating to any party.

So, to us, it’s always an interesting event when we speak of “Bush’s Wars”, Obamacare, and Hilarycare.  Usually the reactions we get come from emotional supporters or detractors.

For instance, if you use the phrase “Bush’s Wars”, a supporter might say:

“Hey!  The Democrats voted for it too, overwhelmingly!!!  So how is it Bush’s War?”

“Because even though Democrats enabled it and supported it, they turned on it only a year later, doing everything they could to derail and stop it during the most sensitive and precarious period.  Bush had to expend all of his political capital to keep the Iraq war stable and moving towards victory and normalization.  That is when it became his war.”


Or you might just get a “Hell yeah, Bush taking care of business and getting those terrorists.”

The same is true of Obamacare and Hilarycare.  Some Democrats laugh at the notion:

“That’s funny!  Why is reforming the broken healthcare system Obamacare? *giggle* *giggle*”

“Because it is his plan and his vision for the reform.  It is a vision which his opponents disagree with and believe will cause more problems and solve nothing.  They have other ideas on how to help solve issues.  Those ideas are entirely dismissed and buried by Obama.  Therefore, it is Obama’s doing.  It is his plan, and so it is Obamacare.  He is responsible for signing it or vetoing it.  His power base developed it with his consent.  He paid the Tides Foundation to write the entire thing.  How can you not call it Obamacare?  Doesn’t he want credit for his work?”


They are no longer giggling.

It’s mind boggling why people are so sensitive to political divisions.  Largely, it is because those divisions were not carefully considered by the individual.  They were nurtured with propaganda, marketing, emotions, and not fully understood.  They enjoin political affiliations to be part of a group that gives their self-image a shape that they desire.  Part of that selfish affiliation is chosen based on meaningless emotional rhetoric and propaganda.

So is it any wonder that when a brand name for a policy is accurately labeled, so many people issue an emotional response?  If we could learn to think critically, then we all would benefit from more constructive discourse.

Published in: on October 14, 2010 at 4:25 PM  Leave a Comment  

A Leftist Cacophony: Unions, Environmentalists, Communists, Anarchists, NGOs, Gays, Palestinian Lobby Mob the G8/G20 with Violence and “we’re queer and fabulous”

SONY DSC Well we pooled our resources to cover the 2010 G8/G20 in Toronto, which essentially means we have underground coverage from inside the “angry mob” of leftists.  We’ll just put forth a sampling of what we gathered as late as Sunday morning (6/27).

Before the well-deserved lambasting, let’s say this – the leftist protestors have a shred of virtue in some of their concerns.  Unfortunately their anger is misdirected, and their actions are guided by animal-like behaviors and immorality.  It is unfortunate that even if a noble voice of reason were to enter their ears, their own ideological and furious dispositions would render them deaf anyway.

If you are a loving and rational citizen, you would wish we had the nobility and peacefulness of the conservative, American Tea Party in the streets of Toronto this weekend.  Instead, what leftists decided to do (yet again) is disgusting.  Hopey-changey Obama is getting wised-up by traditional sentiments like “the more things change the more they stay the same”.

Check out Canada’s Communist Party Reporting, the “queer and fabulous” lobby, the anarchist lobby, the medical lobby ($120/hour rate for doctors on Canadian tax dollars to treat idiots’ little boo-boos from acting like monkeys, oh socialist Canada, your communist protestors do provide grand irony), and the story of the violence.

If you look closely enough at one of the new advertisements for the communist G20 protest, you’ll see they used the Anarchy symbol.  Amazing to me how people still don’t understand the cozy relationship between modern communist strategies and anarchists – it’s only all over the music scene, blogs, and publications from the organizations themselves.  Apparently Glenn Beck is the only one smart enough to actually pay attention to what these organizations and elected officials say in their own words.  Oh, and ex-communists.  Always funny to hear ex-communists who escaped from Russia tell Western liberals how stupid they are when their elected officials speak communist ideas right under their noses, out in the open, and Westerners are too stupid to understand what they’re saying.

g20-197 Anyway, it took 19,000 security personnel and almost $1 BILLION in security expenses to protect this summit from leftist aggression, violence, and militancy.  This time they managed to burn down 3 police cars, bust untold amounts of windows of middle-class-owned businesses, start violence by hurling rocks and bottles at people, and they even came prepared with their own military equipment – gas masks. 

Tell me Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and other American lefties, how much has the activities of Tea Party protestors cost?  I imagine that you could have funded a bunch of “green” startup companies with that $1 BILLION in protection money, caused by your own leftist crazies.  If irony were made of strawberries, we’d all be drinking smoothies.

Possibly my favorite image (although there are many) is depicted above.  A woman with tattoos all over her nasty body, holding a cross with the money symbol on it.  Oh how clever.  Yes, currency, the item we exchange to represent our goods and services for living is the evil burden, and our cross to bear, with a nice double entendre of anti-Christian hate speech (which is another undercurrent of these groups). 

Yes, hate business, hate money, hate corporations, oh wise woman.  Wait a second.  I guess the thousands of dollars you spent tattooing every inch of your body was free.  And if it was, you must be a slave master, because you would’ve had to convince the laborers who spent the days of time in the tattoo parlor, and manufacturing of the instruments and ink to give up all of those hard earned resources and time for your own selfish and discretionary consumption activities.  Now go tell your neighbors how oil is evil and how people in the world are starving, while you enjoy your extravagant tattoos.  I hear a few thousand can feed a family for a year in some countries.  Oh wait.  That was the USA, thanks to the big corporations that you hate.  Silly

How ironic that the G20 leaders are now made up primarily of leftists, and here are their own constituents protesting their own leaders.  Idiots.

Here are more of them (click to see the photo album), complete with environmental hippies, environmental religion (self-proclaimed Earthians), environmentalist Avatar worshippers (way to go James Cameron), communists, socialists, racist communist mass-murderer fans (Che flag), destroyed cop cars, destroyed windows, and even a father-son hippie pair prepared with gas masks (even stoners from the 60s can learn over time how to perfect their non-constructive activities):

Published in: on June 28, 2010 at 9:33 AM  Leave a Comment  

Palestinian Hysteria: Silence from the Left on Kyrgyzstan…Hundreds Murdered, Thousands of Casualties, Hundred Thousand Refugees…but It’s Okay

Sometimes I just can’t believe my eyes.  I feel the same way I did shortly after 911, when I was defending the West from hate-USA liberal activists on university campuses.  I feel the same way that I did when Russia carpet bombed Georgian villages, murdering indiscriminately anyone in their path to seize control of an oil pipeline.  The left was silent.  Socialist Russia got a free pass for indiscriminate bloodshed.  Then the Palestinian flotilla raid involved anti-Israeli, anti-US, terror supporters (not my words, their own, video footage proves it), declaring that they would try to martyr themselves and cause an incident (which they did), assaulting the Israeli enforcers with metal pipes, knifes, blunt-force trauma, and paramilitary tactics (one-two heave-ho).  Yet somehow the Israelis were out of line to defend themselves for enforcing their sovereignty on the sea.  A thing that no leftist would hold against any other government that they like (which is pretty much any government they give free passes to: Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, China, Russia, Egypt, India, France, Germany, Spain, you name it).

And so here we are, hundreds murdered, thousands of casualties, and over a hundred thousand displaced Uzbeks, fleeing for their lives in Kyrgyzstan, victims of racist and ethnic violence – a civil war between Sunni Muslims of different ethnicities, in the heart of a country that was ruled by “worldwide-racial-unity-communist” doctrine for over a century (ha).

Since this atrocity began, I have seen continued coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, handfuls of stories every day.  I’ve seen almost nothing on Kyrgyzstan, which is only about 5000% as violent, bloody, atrocious, and morally reprehensible in comparison to the current Palestinian conflict.

I really want to know from a leftist: are you just engaged in group think, and your brain truly does not comprehend objectivity and truth, or do you really feel that non-Western, non-Christian, non-Capitalist nations are your lifeblood and allegiance, and you will do anything to support them, and the undermining of the West?

I have a feeling that on the surface it is the prior, and in the depths of the psyche, it is the latter, with a smattering of self-imposed guilt and self-flagellation to compensate for the rotten, hypocritical, materialistic, handouts-from-daddy, handouts-from-government, easy-come-easy-go lives they have enjoyed.

Published in: on June 14, 2010 at 9:02 PM  Leave a Comment  

Was Jesus an Evolutionary Socialist (Progressive, Socialist) or a Revolutionary Socialist (Communist)?

It’s unfortunate, this question did not come to me as an inquiry, but rather, was shoved in my face as an assertion.  So how did this conversation about Jesus being a socialist proceed?  As follows:

After claiming that Jesus was a socialist, and being asked for hard references to support that view, Critic of Christ says:

Well, hard references are obviously something that Christians don’t believe in, but off the top of my head…

  1. Jesus believed in no possessions
  2. Jesus loved everyone regardless of their ethnicity or class
  3. Jesus revolted against the government and established religion and capitalism
  4. Jesus taught that we should act as one
  5. Jesus taught that we should ‘turn the other cheek’
  6. Jesus was a laborer and a teacher
  7. Jesus practiced healing and forgiveness

I guess one thing that can be said. that he’s definitely, not, a Capitalist

And my reply:

Interesting, and thank you.

First off, you have an incredibly foreign opinion to me, supported by no facts. By what authority do you claim that "Christians don’t believe in hard references"?

First off, I am a Christian, and in assessing such a claim as to what were the economic dispositions of Jesus Christ, I have apparently used more hard references than you.

Secondly, if you reference historical texts on comparative religion, you might discover that Christian monks (along with other religious monks of prophetic category of religion, such as Confucianism) are some of histories greatest harbingers of hard references, almost entirely responsible for all hard references of historical record, alchemy, religion, nutrition, natural taxonomy, and pre-Sir Francis Bacon science.

Uncorrupted by thousands of hours of entertainment as modern society is, they enjoyed those thousands of hours actually producing and developing such hard references. At the Age of Enlightenment, almost all of the scientific and technological breakthroughs that make your modern life a king’s dream in historical terms, were generated by faithful Christians (should we note the father of Physics, Sir Isaac Newton, a zealous theologian himself?).

You see, those of the prophetic categories of religion tend to take hard references more seriously than their counterparts in mysticism and sacramental. If the foundation of my belief system is all about the experiential or sacrament, then the written information obviously takes a backseat.

If I am of the persuasion of a prophetic religion such as Christianity or Confucianism, then obviously hard references are first and foremost in all of my dealings and worldviews.  Perhaps your experience is with bad Christians who do not respect dogma and study.  This gets us into the essence of ideals versus the personal willpower to accurately match and live the ideals – a shade of lighter or darker gray in all of us.  But let’s not digress.

In terms of your tiny listing above, herein referred to as the Dogma of Moby, developed with no references to any original source, I can even see failures of language and logic in the small treatise – even using zero knowledge of Christianity. This is actually how liberals in the Democrat party end up losing debate after debate – because they draw from half-baked information which is derived from half-truths from the original sources, far removed from the origin of the thoughts and concepts.

Take verse 3 of the Dogma of Moby. It directly contradicts the epilogue of the Dogma of Moby. Verse 3 claims that Jesus established capitalism. The Epilogue claims that he is "definitely not a capitalist". Extremely black and white contradiction.

Verse 2 is a strange injection. Economic systems are colorblind. You can have the communist economic system of USSR for instance purporting "racial unity" as an ideal while at the same time they murder racial sects indiscriminately. You can have a socialist economic system of the Nazi’s, total government control, also outwardly exploiting and murdering those of ethnic origin as well. At the same time you can have a capitalist system that treats people of different racial backgrounds with preference simply by birthright – previously WASPs over my families, or WASPs over blacks, and now with affirmative action, we have new institutionalized favoritism in a semi-capitalist system.

The point is that economic systems may touch ends with ethnic policies in governance, and politicians of all persuasions throughout history have mingled the two by dictatorial imposition or mandate from the people, but the two are independent concepts in correct Christian dogma. In Muslim dogma – different story. The concept of a dhimmi and an exorbitant tax upon Jews and Christians with total intolerance of other "infidels" mingles economic policy with ethnic expression of tradition and faith.

Verse 1 is also immensely strange. A note for all of your exegesis (I assume that you actually have read the entire bible and studied various dogmas derived throughout history) – it appears to be much like many of the incorrect and corrupted dogmas derived by bible-by-verse instead of bible-in-toto. Exegetes who are more politicians and cultural icons than true clergy simply pick verses that, in isolation, represent a dogma which is contradicted when compared to other verses of the bible. True dogma respects every verse to derive the indisputable truths, which agree with each other.

So why is verse 1 strange? Because Jesus on numerous occasions spoke of the right to property of individuals, protecting it, and honoring it. The Ten Commandments and all moral imperatives issued throughout The Word refer to only voluntary charity – not theft and not imposition by government for seizures and redistribution or "forced charity". No place in The Word does Jesus issue a directive for men to abandon all possessions during our earthly lives. In fact, if the dogma of Christ claimed no possession, there could be no moral imperative to "not steal", for if no one owns anything, then stealing is impossible.

Jesus did not "revolt" against the government, he respected its authority in the earthly realm, as in "render unto Caesar". Perhaps you have confused Jesus with Spartacus? The Kingdom that Jesus refers to is The Kingdom of Heaven which operates within the soul of each of us, and on a different plane of existence.

Jesus did not "establish" religion, Pagans did, and in fact, The State Religion is a Pagan tradition that was carried on by the Pagans who converted to Christianity. One of the primary diplomatic components to the success of the Roman Empire was its State Religion which would absorb the gods of its conquered peoples into the fold. Using certain religious cults (including early Christians) as scapegoats in the late empire would prove to be a tincture in Roman power.

How in the world did Jesus "establish capitalism". Analysis of biblical references to economy need to be observed in terms of a barter economy and transformed to modern concepts. Claiming that Jesus established capitalism is outright insane. It would be more accurate to say that emerging from a feudal economy, Calvinist dogma inspired the entire West to historical prosperity using concepts which were in agreement and INSPIRED by moral commands of God in the bible. In fact, Max Weber, the father of sociology explained quite nicely the origins of Capitalism in post-reformation Christian dogma in his classic work "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism":

Such analysis is old news – that the doctrine of Marx, socialism-communism is directly opposed to true Christian dogma. These debates and rigorous analyses were performed ad nauseum by thousands of men much more dedicated, passionate about the subject and more intelligent than you or I.

Verse 4 is also strange. Jesus did not teach that we should act as one. Jesus taught that we are all individuals blessed with free will, that we can choose to accept His divine command and earn His grace, or we can choose not to, and not receive His grace. He taught that we all have our individual crosses to bear and that we should accept them willingly and persevere with the hand we’re dealt, always keeping our eye on His grace and directives.

You confuse the free will of the Abrahamic religions with Pantheism – of the Hindu, Buddhist, and other eastern mystical religions which purport that we are all part of "one" "communal" life force. In the Abrahamic religions, no, we are not a spiritual or literal commune, we are individuals gifted with life and independence by our God, free will, and freedom.

Verse 5. Yes Jesus taught we should "turn the other cheek" sometimes. Other times, Jesus exploded with righteous indignation, turning over tables and screaming at the top of his lungs.

There is a beautiful and indisputably truthful dogma in Christianity. How are we instructed to confront evil? There is an incredibly good piece here:!F1A32E4E3219991B!319.entry

In summary, I would point to 1 Pet 3:15, Matt 5:23, 2 Thess 3:13, and "acting out of understandable pain, frustration, or anger, we likely have given into "the violence that under the illusion of fighting evil only makes it worse" (Centessimus Annus 25)"

We must be relentlessly constructive. Read the article for more details.

Your verse #5 shows a very profound misunderstanding of Christian directives of legitimate redress, again only possible by bible-by-verse (and misinterpreted verse on top of it).

Verse #6? Ahh…well, Calvin was also a teacher and laborer and literally billions of Christians throughout history who understood the superiority of Capitalism and its agreement with Christian dogma…what is your point? Jesus was a laborer and a teacher during a time in which the prevailing economy was barter-based – something much closer to capitalism than communism. Verse 6 is just outright in dead water.

Verse 7? And so do capitalists provide healing and forgiveness, much more than any communist system ever produced. Or should we recommend you take a time machine back to the USSR in 1985 and watch the rural folk enjoy fried rabbit as their best meal, the urban folk eat potato and beet gruel on a daily basis while the oligarchy enjoys lives of kings? Or how about you take a trip back to Mao Zedong’s great leap forward and eat a bowl of rice per day? Even my poor grandparents in the inner city during The Great Depression and before any social programming enjoyed better living standards. What healing and forgiveness is more than the most generous country in history – the USA – whose donations and VOLUNTARY charity on a worldwide basis are greater for over a century than any nation – when private and government aid is combined? What greater act of forgiveness can be demonstrated than the USA’s nurturing of Japan after WW2, after they had murdered hundreds of thousands of civilians in the pacific islands and China? Even dissected human beings alive in Unit 731?

And on, and on, and on.

This Country is a great Country because of its judeo-Christian foundations, albeit far from perfect, but closer than any Country of our day. If you would prefer an earlier source of western ethical though, I recommend Aristotle’s Ethics.

As it stands, your contention of Jesus’ supposed disposition towards Karl Marx, is entirely refuted and holds zero credence as demonstrated here. I again would request that a more reputable hard reference be provisioned if your passionate opinion and zealous faith in the topic does dictate such constructive exchange.

As an additional source, I recommend you follow this video from part 1 through part 4 to understand the difference between equal justice and "social" justice, lest you continuously be decieved by those corruptors who purport to represent Christian thought, when in fact, they do not:

What is amazing to me is that the disturbed individuals who hate religion, don’t realize how much they have in common with annoying evangelizing religionists.  Both troll around seeking to impose their beliefs on their neighbors, by either breaking down their neighbors belief systems with unsolicited ridicule, or executing marketing campaigns that could rival McDonalds in their propaganda.

How about everyone take a lesson from the post-19th century Catholic Church and the Jesuits?  Trust the Holy Spirit to do the conversion, if it’s in the cards.  Your job is simply to know the beauty of Christian doctrine, live it, and be it.  Any Christian whose actions match the beautiful doctrine of their religion will in the least gain respect from open minded people, and at best make them curious about the incredible value well-practiced Christianity adds to the lives of themselves and their neighbors.

Published in: on June 12, 2010 at 11:23 AM  Leave a Comment