Is the Starbucks Logo a Pagan Conspiracy?

Some crazy blog about the Starbucks logo actually turned out to be a really interesting debate between some moderately capable folks.  Read it here.  RAAI weighed in at the very end:

Read the discussion

Published in: on October 22, 2010 at 6:48 PM  Leave a Comment  

Shooting at Pentagon was Not an Accident

Well, based on these details, possibility #1, from our last post is not an option anymore.  The shooting was intentional.  Let’s hope that it’s possibility #2 from our last post and not #3.

Read the story

Published in: on October 19, 2010 at 5:18 PM  Leave a Comment  

Pentagon Attacked, or Accident?

At 5AM in the morning, shots were fired at the Pentagon.

It’s really only one of three things –

  1. A soldier’s itchy finger
  2. An insane prankster
  3. A dry run by terrorists to observe the response pattern.  New threats are likely commando-styled; any plane they try to use as a missile again will be shot out of the sky.  Ideally for the bad guys, they would have insiders like the Fort Hood Muslim begin the attack from inside, and have Muslim terrorists on the outside attack simultaneously.  In this way, they theoretically “erect” a fortress inside of the Pentagon, whereby the good guys, taken by surprise, are essentially in a besieged scenario, the enemy having brought about a virtual circumvallation and contravallation, establishing fire superiority and chaos immediately.

Time will tell, yes?  Maybe a long time for the general public, depending on the result of the investigation.

Read the story

Published in: on October 19, 2010 at 12:34 PM  Leave a Comment  

Muslims and Leftists Beware – Choosing Mass Murder Will Lead to Your Own Demise

Judeo-Christian Western Countries can tolerate civil isolation of cultures almost indefinitely – when differences do not result in crime, and when differences are spoken of and discussed and appreciated with peaceful means.  Countries which are founded on the Judeo-Christian ethics are very peaceful in general, and quick to accept mercy and forgiveness.  The citizens do not study war on a daily basis.  They do not train their children in the art of militancy and revolution.

This mercy can change in an instant to severity though, as we saw on 9/11.  Sustained events will escalate our willingness to accept aggressive action, and believe it, the losers will be the instigators who do not have the technology, the professional expertise, nor the economy to compete with the West.

When violence is done by leftist insurrection groups and Islamic terror groups like The Tarnac 9, the anarchists, Al Qaeda, Al Shabab, and the rest, you will see a different response in the future.  This new foreboding from Germany is yet another in a string of warnings.

Our society will not tolerate mass murder.  If these things come to pass, mark my words, the instigating socialists and/or Islamic Fundamentalists are flirting with a severe routing and persecution, the likes of which we have not seen since WW2. 

Read the story

Published in: on October 17, 2010 at 11:50 PM  Leave a Comment  

Laura Ingraham Shows “The View’s” Behar to be a Bigot, Exposes Leftist Intimidation Tactics

Many times, people are guilty of that which they accuse others.  Laura Ingraham shows how Joy Behar’s childish exposition is entirely hypocritical based on the anti-religious, and anti-Christian things that she has said in the past:

Published in: on October 16, 2010 at 4:11 PM  Leave a Comment  

Women of “The View” Get Outclassed by Bill O’Reilly

It is quite tragic that the women of “The View” misuse their privilege to influence the mom vote.  We now have to deal with a misinformed constituency thanks to the effect these uninformed women have on their significant viewership.

For operating with a childish and snarky culture that is below good American citizens, and for being caught yet again spreading terrible half-truths and misinformation, The View is now officially rejected by RAAI as counterproductive to our Republic. 

When these women go back into straight entertainment and out of the pseudo-news business, we will reconsider the merits of the show.

Here is the material you should keep on hand, and should share with anyone espousing the falsehoods of “The View”:

Women on “The View” Entirely Ignorant of Defense, Islam, and Christianity

What caused this?  This week on “The View”, Bill O’Reilly made the accurate statement of “Muslims attacked us on 9/11”.  This instigated Goldberg and Behar to get up out of their seats, yell at O’Reilly, tower over him, and then walk off the stage. 

Now we have grown adults walking off the stage like children.  Not much different than Jon Stewart’s little arrogant “disconnect” gesture of swiping his hand in your face while he looks to the side, or looking over his shoulder as if you are talking to someone behind him. 

In the video below, items of note – the racist Whoopi, with her typical hostile and bigoted posture towards traditional white people.  She’s done this so many times it’s unbelievable.  We’ve caught her racism in the past during the 2008 presidential election as well, so nothing new here.  What is interesting is that Bill O’Reilly immediately picks up on it.

Also, Joy Behar, little child in a grown woman’s body – when Bill O’Reilly gives her a grown-up joke, she responds with little baby behavior (bunny ears, seriously?), and then she smiles to herself in self-congratulatory arrogance, like a little child who is proud of her little pranky-wanky she just pulled!!!

And how moronic are the women in the audience?  Are they for real?  They actually applauded Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg’s childlike behavior!

My reaction to these little baby girls in grown up bodies was being appalled with their lack of emotional fortitude to process an adult conversation.  I would never applaud that.  I remained silent with a look of disappointment on my face.

Even worse is when Walters and Elizabeth try to hammer out the conversation with revisionist history and ignorance.  Apparently none of these women have ever sat through an history course.

Bill O’Reilly on the other hand, as a former history teacher, does not suffer from the same weakness.

In such history courses, we say “Muslims attacked us on 9/11”, and “The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor”.  When the Japanese screamed “Bonsai!!!” in a murderous rage, they did so by the command of Hirohito.  When the Muslims committed their acts of mass murder, they screamed, “Allahu Akbar!!!” (god is great), so it is irrefutable that they did so at the command of their Muslim god.  It is what binds the Jihad which spawned them.  Jihad.  It’s in the Koran.  Look it up.

And the 50% of the Muslim world (2006 Al Jazeera poll) which supports terrorism (Al Qaeda) would agree.  They even have a name for these Muslim soldiers on behalf of Allah and all Muslims – it’s called Shahid.

When Timothy McVeigh bombed Oklahoma City, on the other hand, it had nothing to do with Christianity.  Timothy McVeigh in fact was an Agnostic.  Yet it still would have been accurate to say that “Militia members attacked Oklahoma City”, even if it is true that we have only had one act of terrorism by militias comparable to the hundreds of mass murders by Muslims in the last 3 decades. 

I think that if someone used the phrase “militia members attacked us”, not a single one of these useful idiot Democrats would have even batted an eyelid.

So why do they start a war when the similarly accurate statements are made about 9/11?

The women of “The View” are so immensely ignorant about all of these topics.  They cannot even conduct a civil and truthful conversation, because their heads have been filled with misinformation by their colleagues.

And poor, tragically ignorant Elizabeth (the worst Republican I’ve ever seen), caught in a blatant falsehood.  Oh well, it goes along with the rest of these women on this day.

Newsflash to Elizabeth, the Obama administration actively rejects the term “Radical Islam” too.  You are spreading lies and ignorance just like the rest of the women on “The View”:

Here’s the mayhem, if you can stand it:

Published in: on October 16, 2010 at 3:54 PM  Leave a Comment  

Women on “The View” Entirely Ignorant of Defense, Islam, and Christianity

This week on “The View”, they towed the “all religions have terrorists” line of ignorance again.  Specifically, they equate modern terrorism inspired by Islam to other modern religions.

This is such an incredible insult to honest students of history, theology, and martial affairs.  It makes people ignorant of the fact that conflict and violence originates from sin, desperation, and worldviews – not from religion.  Religion is a tool that has been misused by people of power throughout history for violence.  But so too have other codified worldviews like certain forms of Paganism, Socialism, Communism, and Environmentalism – godless religions so to speak (a much bigger question of philosophy is “what is a religion?”).

In fact, the worst atrocities we have seen, with the most deaths, and the most torture and inhumanity have been perpetrated by agnostics, atheists, pagans, and earth worshippers.  Napoleon, Hitler, Mao Zedong, Stalin, Lenin, Hirohito, Caesar, dozens of Chinese dynasties throughout thousands of years, the Assyrians, the Macedonians, the Vikings, the Persians, and on and on and on…

Repeatedly, the trend that we see is that the less that the worldview cherishes human life, and the more excuses for the mistreatment and SUBORIDINATION of human life that are possible by the doctrine at hand, then the greater level of atrocity is expressed when we come to blows.

But for now, let’s look at how traditional religions have been used in the past 100 years across the globe towards violent ends.

Since the Muslim Brotherhood has been operating beginning in the early 20th century, Islam has been the most violent religious tool in brainwashing people towards violence.  The only worse instigator is the religion of socialism whether in its National Socialist format (Nazis) or Communist format. 

It’s not to say that Islam could not be redeemed by peaceful people, but it is unlikely in our lifetimes thanks to the hostile takeover of Islam by Muslim statesman, clerics, businessmen, and military leaders for over 100 years. 

Their violent acolytes have been programmed from childhood and are living amongst us.  What better way to subordinate human life than to put automatic rifles into the hands of children barely tall enough to carry them?

And what better way to inspire a feasible scapegoat for your own country’s failures at the hands of authoritarian tyrants, than to evoke historical images of conquest and human subordination (remember, Islam is the religion of submission), than to tell Muslims that someday they will get to make another holocaust and take the place of Nazis?

A 2006 Al Jazeera poll showed that about 50% of Muslims supported Al Qaeda & Usama Bin Laden.  That is quite a statement.  Basically, it means that anyone who tells you that “most Muslims are peaceful” are either entirely ignorant or lying to your face.

I know what my childhood education was like.  I didn’t have automatic rifles, suicide bombing reenactments, applauded by parents and teachers, nor did I have propaganda like this poisoning my brain:

We have reached yet another breaking point with Democrat revisionist history.  I swear if I hear someone associate Timothy McVeigh (an agnostic) to Christianity one more time, I will pick them up off the floor, and will shake the living crap out of them until they agree to pick up a book and educate themselves.

Timothy McVeigh did not bomb Oklahoma City because of any Christian motives.  HE WAS AGNOSTIC.  Unlike Muslims, he did not shout, “Jesus is great!” while murdering human beings.

Timothy McVeigh was an intelligent man, from a broken home, who turned his psychological torment in the home and in social circles into hatred towards the US government. 

This is not special in criminality.  It is a par-for-the-course path for children abandoned and rejected.  They take out their anger on authority, because their authorities early in life betrayed them.

In the Muslim world, such hostility is turned to the West, Jews, and Americans, as their religious leaders, politicians, and teachers constantly brainwash them into using Westerners as a scapegoat for all of the iniquities and problems they face.

In contrast, Timothy McVeigh’s motivations had nothing to do with Christianity, in fact, with a stronger Christian influence, he could’ve been redeemed from his suffering as a child and used the intellect which allowed him to hack US military networks for productive and benevolent activities. 

There were 100 successfully devastating Muslim attacks on US citizens and soil (including embassies) from 1979 to 1999.  Since 9/11, there are about 1,000 such plots thwarted per year.  Plots of mass murder at the hands of Islamic Fundamentalists, inspired by their Muslim faith.

To date, there are still ZERO plots inspired by Christianity comparable to even a single mass murder plot on civilians of another country or religion, inspired by religious bigotry.  Muslims hold the grand award for this modern atrocity of terrorism.

Why are we surprised?  I have yet to see a single Christian terror camp showing its followers how to be more like Jesus the soldier carpenter.

Why are we surprised?  Outside of Fox News Channel, journalists are too brainwashed and ideological to even be honest enough to report the findings of that Al Jazeera poll, because with 50% of Muslims supporting Al Qaeda, it totally contradicts their narrative of “peace” and the poor “misunderstood” minority citizen.

Yes Democrats, let’s continue to ignore the truth when it stares us in the face.  Let’s continue to delude ourselves and live in fantasy worlds, simply to selfishly protect the integrity of our own hopes, dreams, and worldviews.

The ladies of “The View” need a serious education.

Published in: on October 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM  Comments (1)  

Democrat Insanity at its Peak – Lies, Lies, and More Damn Lies

Obama and Democrat congresspersons have been taking an insane position for the past 2 years.  The formula?  When they put for bad ideas that their own people don’t agree with, they blame the Republicans for “standing in the way” or “not compromising” etc.

Does this utter bull crap fool anyone except the useful idiots in their own constituency?

News flash – Democrats have controlled a majority of congress since January 4th, 2007.  They have super majorities since January 2009, and essentially free reign over our entire government, going on 2 years now.

The fact that they can’t get bills through is for one reason and one reason alone – they have bad ideas that they can’t even get their own party to fully agree upon.  The Republicans could not even show up to congress and the Democrats could keep passing bills if they could agree with each other.

How Obama expects to blame the minority Republicans for Democrat incompetency and divisiveness is mind boggling.  Does he think the American people are too stupid to understand basic math?

Get your Democrats in line Obama.  You’ve got about 3 more months to have your unimpeded free reign over the entire government.  The only thing you have to blame for anything that failed to get done is your own leadership.

Published in: on October 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM  Leave a Comment  

The Democrat-Obamacare Healthcare Reformation is 100% Illegal (By Obama’s Own Words)

Obama’s done it this time.  Eventually liars and deceivers undo themselves with their evil.  This is why moral people say, “honesty is the best policy”.

There is absolutely nothing Obama can do to get out of this mess now.  He is caught in a completely dirty and deceptive lie.

As you may or may not know, many states throughout the country have filed lawsuits against the federal government to protect themselves from Obamacare.  The basis of the lawsuits is that Obamacare forces citizens to buy something, and it is an unconstitutional interpretation of the commerce clause, which only gives the government the ability to tax – not the ability to force you to buy something.

So what is Obama’s defense against these lawsuits?  What does he have his team of bureaucrats and lawyers using to defend against this?  His defense is that it is a taxIn the courts, Obama says that Obamacare is a tax, and thus he is not forcing you to buy something.

Compare Obama’s official positions used in legal defense to the resulting lies coming out of his mouth to the American people:

Sept. 20, 2009: Obama got in a spat with host George Stephanopoulos during an interview on "This Week." Stephanopoulos suggested that the proposed fines against those who don’t purchase health insurance as required by the new health care package amount to a tax on the middle class. Obama disputed that point.

"It’s still a tax increase," Stephanopoulos said.

"No. That’s not true," said Obama. "For us to say that you’ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase. … You can’t just make up that language and decide that that’s called a tax increase."

Stephanopoulos then read aloud the dictionary definition of "tax" to the president of the United States.

Obama responded: "George, the fact that you looked up Merriam’s Dictionary, the definition of tax increase, indicates to me that you’re stretching a little bit right now."

"But you reject that it’s a tax increase?" the host asked.

"I absolutely reject that notion," Obama said.

So in other words, if Obama were asked by the judges who are adjudicating whether or not Obamacare is a tax, and in order to uphold it, they have to rule that it IS a tax, then Obama would have to appear in court, and go against his own people, and testify that he “absolutely rejects that notion”, thereby making his own Obamacare bill illegitimate, and demanding a repeal of his own bill.

Or else he has to go back on ABC and say that he lied to the American people about not increasing middle class taxes, AND he lied about the classification of his healthcare impositions as a new tax.

As it stands, he is currently asserting one thing to the courts, and the exact opposite thing to the American people.

A more clear-cut case of liar-supreme?  I can’t imagine.

Published in: on October 14, 2010 at 11:27 AM  Leave a Comment  

NYT Continues with Gay Normalization Plot, Glenn Beck Co-opts It. Inner City Issues? Still Whitewashed. Here is the Solution.

The previous post, Bunch of White Democrats Crap on Inner City Realities, set forth the notion that a media which has not been educated in morality, analytical thinking, or mathematics creates public perception in a deceptive or delusional way.

Our previous post cited current legacy media operations involved in the larger progressive Democrat plot for the cultural normalization of homosexuality.

This plot involves:

  1. Gay is Cool – Making homosexuality “cool” and “trendy” with the younger generation through music, movies, television, modeling, fashion, and sports culture
  2. Gays are Civil Rights Victims – Educating students in high school and college to believe that gays are a terrorized minority equivalent to African Americans in the South during segregation
  3. Gays are Sexy – putting massive money behind lesbian pornography to create a psychological wedge of “good gay” and “bad gay” in the minds of hedonic and impressionable men.  Once “good gay” of stimulating their own libido is accepted, then “bad gay” becomes not so bad after their own psychological transformation to participate in homosexual activity via voyeurism
  4. Gays are Experiencing Inordinate Criminal Victimhood – “hard news” outfits trumping up stories of anti-gay sentiments and crimes, by cherry-picking the ones out of thousands of crimes which support the normalization of homosexuality via garnering sympathies

One RAAI author was challenged on her social network about the previous article by a Democrat.  In response, the RAAI author simply commanded the detractor to do what the article says – look up weekly suicide stats.

The detractor did, and summarily apologized to the RAAI author.  What did she find out?

United States Center for Disease Control (CDC) reports 34,598 suicides in 2007.  That is about 665 suicides per week across the nation. 

Now, tell me, why did the legacy media trump up 3 homosexual suicides out of the 1,996 human beings who committed suicide during the same time frame?

Even assuming that 1.5% of the population is gay, it means that about 30 gays statistically should have committed suicide in the same time period, just based on their share of the population – for no other reason than statistical demographic distribution.

But again, why focus on 3 out of 1,996 human beings who committed suicide in the same period?

Our opinion?  Because the legacy media is engaged in a brainwashing operation, that’s why.  It’s exactly as the first RAAI author said.  They have an agenda, and they will use cherry-picked “hard news” stories to create public sentiment, regardless of how close to reality the implications are.

Today, Glenn Beck picked up a story from the New York Times about an anti-gay motivated crime which has left four men beat up terribly and tortured nearly to the point of permanent injury, but it is likely that all will recover without permanent injury.

How did Glenn Beck report it?  He reported it in a segment about decency.  Glenn Beck claimed that he can’t remember seeing something so terrible in his life, as the torture that the Latin Kings put these four gay men through.  The New York Times and many Gay Advocacy groups would agree.

But they are all incredibly ignorant on this topic.  What are they missing?  The crux, as usual.

Yes, this story of the anti-gay beatings deserves national attention.  But here are the unspoken truths which should be reported by some journalist who has honesty:

  1. Cause of the beatings: inner city violence, depraved minority (Hispanic & African American) cultural demagoguery not having to do with religion. 
  2. A message to gays: your enemy is not really devoutly religious people, your dangerous enemy is culturally-driven bigotry, which may or may not involve a corrupted religious driver.
  3. In the fight for legal rights, aim towards Civil Unions.  Most Americans support these, and prominent gays do too.  They would issue the same rights as marriage while respecting traditional heterosexual culture at the same time.

As far as never having seen anything as bad as these gay beatings, I’m so sorry Glenn Beck and New York Times…but you all are painfully ignorant and comfortably sheltered if you really believe that.

These gays got away with their lives and without permanent injury.  It’s not trivial, but it is not close to the worst evil we have seen.

So what are things in recent memory that are even worse than this anti-gay crime?

Let’s not forget the story of racist blacks doing acts of horror against whites in 2007 which deserved even more coverage than this anti-gay crime.  That story was absolutely buried by the American Democrat legacy media machine.  It got more coverage in the UK than it did in the US, where it happened.

If you didn’t hear about it, you absolutely must read about it to honor the legacy of the poor victims, the poor white couple who are every bit as much martyrs of civil rights as any black or slave who ever had these things happen to them many decades ago. 

These white civil rights victims represent thousands of murdered and raped victims since the DoJ has been tracking violent crime stats.  And the Democrat legacy media whitewashes and turns a blind eye to this black-on-white racist extravaganza, statistically abhorrent, and yet entirely buried by ideological Democrats. 

These massacred and tortured whites represent a victim group at the hand of racist black people, which the cowards in the media fail to even acknowledge.  Of note (from Color of Crime, DoJ-derived stats):

  • Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
  • Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
  • Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
  • Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

Read the story

What else is worse than this anti-Gay crime?

I don’t have time to bring up the amount of horror I have seen in 9 years of studying Islamic Fundamentalism.  Any of hundreds of stories I have read, photos I have seen, videos I have been scarred by could make these anti-Gay beatings look compassionate in comparison. 

We’re not talking horror-show light.  We’re talking horror-show extreme.  And none of these victims got away with their lives.


They were gruesomely and brutally murdered after torture including dismemberment of fingers and limbs, real rape (not rape by objects), having their genitals cut off and burned in front of them while they are still alive, in front of both them and their spouse, having eyes gouged out, tongues cut out, ears cut off, electro-shocked until the flesh is burned, made to hang until joints are dislocated, and what seems to be merciful in comparison – being beheaded as a finale. 


There are even other practices like Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) that is a matter of practice in many Islamic Fundamentalist communities – as a normal course of living, not even criminalized.

Care to re-evaluate your outrage and foci, legacy media? 

Look, the reason why this is so important is because if we expect to solve the biggest problems for the most people, and if we expect to direct our energies and resources towards the greatest goods, we need to honestly and correctly assess the dangers of our world. 

In addition, we need to be objective in the causation and impetus for the problems, or else we will never solve them.

For these gay stories, the answer is in morality and human decency in treating all human beings with respect and dignity, pacifism, and non-violence.  Drawing lines in the sand based on skin color, religious affiliation, or party politics will not solve the issues, and if any progress is made, the tactic of division will tear us apart in the process.

As I have stated before, cultural demagoguery and bigotry is the anti-gay culprit, not religions.  No religious person from a serious religious sect promotes legal inferiority or violence against gays. 

When you delude yourself into thinking religion is the problem, what happens is that you get idiotic Democrats rushing into Churches with pamphlets and mocking religious people.  To the weak at heart, this fuels the flames of justified hatred.

And the Tom and Jerry cartoon continues, on…and on…and on…and on…

The real solutions are not making it “cool” to be gay, or “sexy” to be gay, or hating religious people.  This is a deceptive clandestine plot by liberal progressive elites, using the instruments of culture to deceive the public into normalization.

The real solution is the same one that Jesus Christ put forth.  Follow the moral commands.  Be good, virtuous people, devoid of pride, envy, greed, gluttony, lust, wrath, and sloth.  Give gay detractors absolutely nothing to point to in terms of aberrant behavior.

When you are attacked, turn the other cheek.  Help other people, and make yourself a loving asset to your neighbor, full of virtue. 

If all gays did this, it would only be a matter of time before the haters and bigots kill their own platform and fall on their own sword.  The culture of anti-hero, rabble rouser, deviant, flamboyant, and “special snowflake” will only continue to divide and isolate factions of society.  For every claim of “special” status a gay advocate makes, people who do not belong to that group are inspired to assert their “special” status.  It is an endless game of pride and envy.

Homosexuality is a choice which belongs in the bedroom, just like heterosexuality.  Why have we lost sight of this?  As human beings engaged in communities where business and socializing occurs, why can’t we put aside the choices which occur in the bedroom and coexist peacefully?

Published in: on October 13, 2010 at 9:16 PM  Leave a Comment